From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abraham v. Cates

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 1, 2024
23-cv-03587-PCP (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-03587-PCP

03-01-2024

ALEC SCOTT ABRAHAM, Petitioner, v. BRIAN CATES, Respondent.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

P. Casey Pitre, United States District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner at California Correctional Institution, in Tehachapi, California, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner challenges his conviction from Orange County Superior Court. See id. at 1 (the challenged conviction is from “OC Superior Court”); see also People v. Abraham, Case No. S273392 (Cal. S.Ct.) (showing Petitioner's direct appeal came from California's Fourth District Court of Appeal).

Although venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), petitions challenging a conviction or sentence are preferably heard in the district of conviction, Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1). See also Laue v. Nelson, 279 F.Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Because Petitioner challenges a conviction from Orange County, the Central District of California is the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(c).

Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the Central District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Abraham v. Cates

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 1, 2024
23-cv-03587-PCP (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Abraham v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:ALEC SCOTT ABRAHAM, Petitioner, v. BRIAN CATES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 1, 2024

Citations

23-cv-03587-PCP (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2024)