From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abpikar v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-01793-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01793-DLB PC

01-30-2013

HASSAN ABPIKAR, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


ECF No. 21


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

Plaintiff Hassan Abpikar ("Plaintiff") is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On October 10, 2012, the Court screened Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and ordered Plaintiff either to file an amended complaint within thirty days or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable. ECF No. 19. On November 27, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff up to and including December 28, 2012 by which to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 21. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Abpikar v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-01793-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Abpikar v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:HASSAN ABPIKAR, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01793-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)