From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abood v. Weingarten

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 19, 1956
139 N.E.2d 47 (Ohio 1956)

Opinion

No. 34983

Decided December 19, 1956.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Real property — Restrictive covenants on lots in subdivision — Imposed by common grantor — Part of uniform plan for development — Enforceable against subsequent grantee with deed not containing restriction — Notice of restriction — Sufficiency — Injunction.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Messrs. Van Aken, Whiting, Arnold Nash and Mr. Herbert R. Whiting, for appellees.

Messrs. Simmons, Metzner, McNelly, Torbet Vilas, for appellants.


The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Abood v. Weingarten

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 19, 1956
139 N.E.2d 47 (Ohio 1956)
Case details for

Abood v. Weingarten

Case Details

Full title:ABOOD ET AL., APPELLEES v. WEINGARTEN ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 19, 1956

Citations

139 N.E.2d 47 (Ohio 1956)
166 Ohio St. 111

Citing Cases

National City Bank v. Welch

{¶ 14} Generally speaking, restrictive covenants run with the land — i.e., they bind subsequent purchasers of…

DD&F Franklin Real Estate, LLC v. Hondros

Generally speaking, restrictive covenants "run with the land"--i.e., they bind subsequent purchasers of real…