From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdullah v. City of San Diego

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2021
Case No. 18cv1634 DMS (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 18cv1634 DMS (MSB)

03-04-2021

DOMINQUE ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, BLAKE WILLIAMS, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE MOTION TO VACATE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DATES UNTIL AFTER COURT RULES ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pending before the Court is Defendant Blake Williams' ex parte motion to continue the trial date, the pretrial conference and related dates pending resolution of his motion for summary judgment. According to Defendant, Plaintiff does not agree to the motion, but he did not file an opposition. In light of Chief Judge Order No. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 62, which continues civil jury trials until on or after June 1, 2021, the Court grants the motion to vacate the trial date. However, Defendant's request to vacate all other dates and deadlines is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2021

/s/_________

Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Abdullah v. City of San Diego

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2021
Case No. 18cv1634 DMS (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Abdullah v. City of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:DOMINQUE ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

Case No. 18cv1634 DMS (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)