From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abcon Associates v. Apollo Theatre Investor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 1990
159 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 6, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.).


Summary judgment will be granted only where there is a "prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case". (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853.) In the instant case, there remains a triable issue of fact as to whether ATIG terminated its contract with Abcon for cause or without cause. Although ATIG did not give written notice of default to Abcon, this would not preclude it from claiming damages. (See, Zweig Sons v Tuscarora Constr. Co., 50 A.D.2d 1069.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

Abcon Associates v. Apollo Theatre Investor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 1990
159 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Abcon Associates v. Apollo Theatre Investor

Case Details

Full title:ABCON ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. APOLLO THEATRE INVESTOR GROUP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 210

Citing Cases

Town of Wilson v. Town of Newfane

Whether the term "maintenance", as used in the agreement, encompasses closure presents an ambiguity to be…

Blass v. Kincaid Consulting

According to defendants, Blass demonstrated a poor work ethic from the outset, and they terminated him…