From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abboud v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 26, 2006
182 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Argued and Submitted May 19, 2006.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Perry S. Dobson, Hayward, CA, for Plaintiffs--Appellants.

B. Clyde Hutchinson, Esq., Lori A. Sebransky, Esq., Lombardi, Loper & Conant LLP, Oakland, CA, for Defendants--Appellees.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-04140-VRW.

Before: B. FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.

Because the district court correctly determined that plaintiffs' negligence claims against Union Pacific Railroad Company are without merit under Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal.2d 108, 70 Cal.Rptr. 97, 443 P.2d 561 (1968), and because the district court correctly determined that plaintiffs' negligence claims against Amtrak are completely preempted, see CSX Transp., Inc. v. Easterwood, 507 U.S. 658, 675, 113 S.Ct. 1732, 123 L.Ed.2d 387 (1993), the district court's thorough order granting summary judgment to defendants is AFFIRMED.

Judge Kozinski would affirm for precisely the reasons set forth in the district court's entirely correct order.


Summaries of

Abboud v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 26, 2006
182 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Abboud v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Hayat ABBOUD; Frank Abboud; Ibrahim Abboud; Samir Abboud; Nadia Abboud…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 26, 2006

Citations

182 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Tese-Milner v. Capstone Credit, LLC (In re Level 8 Apparel, LLC)

To determine who, between the Debtor and Capstone Capital, Costco was obligated to pay for the goods…

Spencer v. PeaceHealth

PeaceHealth cites Atkins v. Praxair Inc. to argue that the Ninth Circuit has held wrongful termination in…