Opinion
April, 1919.
Judgment of County Court reversed and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs to appellants in this court and in the County Court. Held, that there was sufficient evidence of an employment of the plaintiffs by the defendant through his agent to effect an exchange of defendant's property and that it was error to reverse the judgment of the Municipal Court upon the ground that the proof was insufficient to support the finding of such an employment. All concurred.