Opinion
A22A0045
08-17-2021
A MINOR CHILD C. H., BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIANS CHRISTOPHER JASON HOLLAND et al. v. VIEWPOINT HEALTH.
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
Minor child C. H., through his legal guardians, filed this tort action against ViewPoint Health and minor child K. D. ViewPoint moved to dismiss the claims asserted against it. Following a hearing, the trial court granted the motion, dismissing the complaint with prejudice "as to ViewPoint Health." C. H. then filed this direct appeal, but we lack jurisdiction.
OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) generally allows direct appeals from final judgments. "In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment." Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga.App. 628, 629 (385 S.E.2d 731) (1989) (punctuation omitted). Such a ruling may be appealed only if the trial court makes an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and an express direction for the entry of judgment under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), or the party seeking to appeal complies with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 56-34 (b). See id.
The record before us contains no indication that the trial court directed the entry of judgment under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or that C. H.'s claims against the remaining defendant, K. D., have been dismissed. Because the claims against K. D. remain pending, the order dismissing the complaint as to ViewPoint is a non-final order that did not resolve all issues in the case. See Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Hill, 252 Ga.App. 774, 775 (1) (556 S.E.2d 468) (2001); Johnson, 192 Ga.App. at 629. Therefore, C. H. was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 S.E.2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 S.E.2d 103) (1991). C. H.'s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
At the hearing on ViewPoint's motion to dismiss, the trial court stated that K. D. had not yet been served.