From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Furr

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec 24, 2013
416 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 99987.

2013-12-24

A–1 PREMIUM ACCEPTANCE, INC., Appellant, v. Kimberly FURR, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Lawrence J. Permuter, Judge. Lauren L. Mann, Lawrence, KS, for Appellant. Kimberly Furr, Orlando, FL, pro se for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Lawrence J. Permuter, Judge.
Lauren L. Mann, Lawrence, KS, for Appellant. Kimberly Furr, Orlando, FL, pro se for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

A–1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. (“A–1”) appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Kimberly Furr (“Furr”). A–1 argues the trial court's judgment was contrary to the weight of the evidence and misapplied agency and contract law.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Furr

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec 24, 2013
416 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Furr

Case Details

Full title:A–1 PREMIUM ACCEPTANCE, INC., Appellant, v. Kimberly FURR, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

Citations

416 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)