From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

9MM Model PT 111 v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 15, 2009
No. 09-08-00526-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-08-00526-CV

Opinion Delivered January 15, 2009.

On Appeal from the 411th District Court San Jacinto County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 10907.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On December 4, 2008, Chad Davis filed a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal. The appellee did not file a response to the motion. The trial court signed the judgment on July 31, 2008. Assuming the appellate timetables were extended by the timely filing of a post-judgment motion on or before September 2, 2008, notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 29, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Davis filed a notice of appeal dated November 28, 2008, on December 4, 2008. The notice is both dated and filed more than ninety days from the date of judgment and outside the time for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, we deny the motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

9MM Model PT 111 v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 15, 2009
No. 09-08-00526-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2009)
Case details for

9MM Model PT 111 v. State

Case Details

Full title:9MM TAURUS MODEL PT 111 HANDGUN SERIAL NO. TTD 96410, .45 CAL FIRESTAR…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

No. 09-08-00526-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2009)