From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

84 Lumber Co. v. White-Partain

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Aug 24, 2010
C.A. No. S08L-11-015 THG (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 24, 2010)

Opinion

C.A. No. S08L-11-015 THG.

Submitted: August 3, 2010.

Decided: August 24, 2010.

On Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment: DENIED.

On Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment: DENIED.

Dean A. Campbell, Esquire, Law Office of Dean A. Campbell, LLC, Georgetown, DE.

Joseph C. Raskauskas, Esquire, Bethany Beach, DE.

Michael C. Heyden, Esquire, Wilmington, DE.


Dear Counsel:

As counsel are aware, on July 29, 2010, The Honorable Richard F. Stokes issued a decision in a related matter, 84 Lumber Co. v. Derr, et al., C.A. No. S08L-11-014. By way of that decision, Judge Stokes denied the cross motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Plaintiff 84 Lumber Co. and Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs Shane M. Brice and Brice Builders, Inc.

The issues presented in the case pending before the Court today are identical to those considered by Judge Stokes. Therefore, for the reasons articulated in Judge Stokes's well-reasoned opinion, Plaintiff 84 Lumber Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs Shane M. Brice and Brice Builders, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The matter will go forward as scheduled.


Summaries of

84 Lumber Co. v. White-Partain

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Aug 24, 2010
C.A. No. S08L-11-015 THG (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 24, 2010)
Case details for

84 Lumber Co. v. White-Partain

Case Details

Full title:84 Lumber Co. v. White-Partain, et al

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County

Date published: Aug 24, 2010

Citations

C.A. No. S08L-11-015 THG (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 24, 2010)