5350 Park, LLC v. Grycon LLC

Full title: 5350 Park, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. Grycon LLC., etc., Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

No. 3D22-1632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

3D22-1632

03-13-2024

5350 Park, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. Grycon LLC., etc., Appellee.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Joy Spillis Lundeen, Michael A. Hanzman, Felix X. Rodriguez, and Kelly R. Melchiondo; Link & Rockenbach, PA, Kara Rockenbach Link, and Scott J. Link (West Palm Beach), for appellant. Siegfried Rivera and Stuart Sobel; Wallen | Kelley and Todd L. Wallen; Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Deborah S. Corbishley, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 20-11660 William Thomas, Judge.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Joy Spillis Lundeen, Michael A. Hanzman, Felix X. Rodriguez, and Kelly R. Melchiondo; Link & Rockenbach, PA, Kara Rockenbach Link, and Scott J. Link (West Palm Beach), for appellant.

Siegfried Rivera and Stuart Sobel; Wallen | Kelley and Todd L. Wallen; Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Deborah S. Corbishley, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. Mining &Materials v. Mobley, 649 So.2d 934, 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) ("[C]ase[s] may not be retried on appeal, and a ruling which is supported by competent substantial evidence will be upheld even though there may be some persuasive evidence to the contrary."); Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc., 922 So.2d 271, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("Mere speculation or inference of negligence is insufficient to defeat summary judgment."); Ramsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 124 So.3d 415, 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ("Conclusory, general assertions do not create factual disputes necessary to avoid summary judgment."); McCoy v. Hollywood Quarries, Inc., 544 So.2d 274, 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (holding that order which was not appealed was law of the case and prohibited litigant from arguing matters to the contrary in subsequent appeal); Polaco v. Smith, 376 So.2d 409, 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (explaining that failure to object to witness testimony at trial waives the objection); State v. Hampton, 44 So.3d 661, 664-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (requiring that an objection challenging the sufficiency of the evidence must be raised at trial in order to preserve it for appellate review).