From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

50 East 78, L.P. v. Paneth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 5, 1998
247 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

Decided February 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).


We perceive no reasons in equity for departing from the well settled rule that junior mortgagees who were not joined in the foreclosure of a senior mortgage, and who desire to exercise their right to redemption, must pay not merely the amount bid at the auction but the amount due on the mortgage (see, 78 N.Y. Jur 2d, Mortgages and Deeds of Trust, § 400, citing, inter alia, Benedict v. Gilman, 4 Paige Ch 58; Quaremba v. Nassau Suffolk Lbr. Supply Corp., 21 Misc.2d 645, 647).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

50 East 78, L.P. v. Paneth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 5, 1998
247 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

50 East 78, L.P. v. Paneth

Case Details

Full title:50 EAST 78, L.P., Respondent, v. SAMUEL PANETH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

Home American Credit Inc. v. Kurtz

Plaintiff opposes defendant's request and argues that defendant assumed the risk of redemption of the entire…

Davis v. Cole

The current Rent Stabilization Code addresses elimination of cooperative ownership of formerly rent-regulated…