From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

3M Company v. Mohan

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 5, 2010
Civil 09-1413 ADM/FLN (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2010)

Summary

holding that the court had specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant that used eBay.com and Amazon.com to sell products which allegedly infringed trademarks and patent held by the resident plaintiff

Summary of this case from Furminator, Inc. v. Wahba

Opinion

Civil 09-1413 ADM/FLN.

March 5, 2010


ORDER


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated February 18, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to change venue [#2] is DENIED.


Summaries of

3M Company v. Mohan

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 5, 2010
Civil 09-1413 ADM/FLN (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2010)

holding that the court had specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant that used eBay.com and Amazon.com to sell products which allegedly infringed trademarks and patent held by the resident plaintiff

Summary of this case from Furminator, Inc. v. Wahba
Case details for

3M Company v. Mohan

Case Details

Full title:3M Company, Plaintiff, v. Pradeep Mohan, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Mar 5, 2010

Citations

Civil 09-1413 ADM/FLN (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2010)

Citing Cases

Merchant Advisory Grp. v. Merchants Advisory Grp., LLC

To prove trademark infringement, a plaintiff must show that (1) it owns valid, protectable marks, and (2) a…

Univ. of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth Sys. of Higher Educ. v. Varian Med. Sys., Inc.

Varian contends that the phrase "adapted for use" means that the beam generator need not be present during…