From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

3M COMPANY v. DARLET-MARCHANTE-TECHNOLOGIE SA

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 5, 2009
Civil No. 08-827 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. May. 5, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-827 (JNE/SRN).

May 5, 2009

Larry D. Espel, Esq., Greene Espel, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff.

Phillip R. Krass, Esq., Krass Monroe, PA, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 21] is DENIED.


Summaries of

3M COMPANY v. DARLET-MARCHANTE-TECHNOLOGIE SA

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 5, 2009
Civil No. 08-827 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. May. 5, 2009)
Case details for

3M COMPANY v. DARLET-MARCHANTE-TECHNOLOGIE SA

Case Details

Full title:3M Company, Plaintiff, v. Darlet-Marchante-Technologie SA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-827 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. May. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ernst v. Hinchliff

Failure to comply with service requirements can, at the discretion of the court, serve as the basis for…

In re Bavelis

The Debtor, therefore, must address insufficiencies of process and any service deficiencies before the Court…