From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

37th Street Enter. v. 500-512 Seventh Avenue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1999
266 A.D.2d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 4, 1999

Michael N. Coritsidis, Plaintiffs-Respondents.

Daniel M. Kolko, Defendant-Appellant.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., WILLIAMS, TOM, MAZZARELLI, SAXE, JJ.


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about April 28, 1999, which granted plaintiffs' motion for a Yellowstone injunction on condition that plaintiffs pay certain past due and future use and occupancy, post a bond in the amount of $2,000, and tender proof of insurance, all within deadlines set by the court, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff tenants met the necessary criteria to obtain a Yellowstone injunction by showing that they (1) hold a commercial lease, (2) received a notice of default/notice to cure from the landlord, (3) made an application for injunctive relief prior to the termination of the lease, and (4) have the desire and ability to cure the alleged defaults (see, First Natl. Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., Inc., 21 N.Y.2d 630; Empire State Bldg. Assocs. v. Trump Empire State Partners, 245 A.D.2d 225, 227). Based on the hearing testimony, the motion court properly found that plaintiff tenants exercised diligence in responding to the cure notice. The application for Yellowstone relief was timely and the court properly granted said relief notwithstanding defendant landlord's belated and apparently meritless claim that plaintiffs had irremediably breached a material obligation of the parties' lease by failing to obtain certain insurance. Contrary to defendant's contention, the motion court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by failing to place more stringent conditions upon the relief afforded plaintiffs (see, CPLR 6212[b]). Finally, we note that, although defendant contends that the motion court failed to quantify use and occupancy, that was accomplished by the court in a subsequent order.

M-61 69- 37th St. Enterprises v. 500-512 Seventh Ave .

Motion seeking leave to file supplemental record granted.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

37th Street Enter. v. 500-512 Seventh Avenue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1999
266 A.D.2d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

37th Street Enter. v. 500-512 Seventh Avenue

Case Details

Full title:37 th Street Enterprises, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. 500-512…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 601

Citing Cases

Repony Corp. v. R & F Realty Co.

Plaintiff argues that it is current on the payment of rent. A court, in the exercise of its discretion, can…

93 S. St. Rest. Corp. v. S. St. Seaport Ltd. P'ship

Plaintiff argues that these premises and the storage premises are not currently being used. That the court…