Opinion
May 22, 1972
Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, IRVING YOUNGER, J.
Gubman Sitomer ( Joseph G. Gubman and Robert I. Edlitz of counsel), for appellant.
Carb, Luria, Glassner, Cook Kufeld ( Bernard B. Sumliner of counsel), for respondent.
The failure to allege in the petition that "the premises are not a multiple dwelling" as required by the New York City Civil Court Rules (22 NYCRR 2900.21 [f]), is a defect which can be amended by motion at any time before conclusion of the trial ( Rosgro Realty Co. v. Braynen, 70 Misc.2d 808; Presta v. Circle Studios, N.Y.L.J., April 7, 1972, p. 2, col. 5).
The other objections raised as to jurisdiction have no merit.
The order should be reversed with $10 costs, and motion to dismiss the petition should be denied, matter remitted to the court below for trial of the traverse.
Concur — STREIT, J.P., QUINN and GOLD, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.