From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

29 W. 25th Street Parking Corp. v. Penn Post Parking

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 1085 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided April 25, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Amos E. Bowman, J.

Jack Rabin and Judith Roth for appellant-respondent.

Owen McGivern, Allan R. Freedman, Marc E. Fleishman and Leon Liner for respondents-appellants.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), appeal taken as of right by defendant dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the dissents at the Appellate Division are not on questions of law (CPLR 5601 [a] [i]). Order, insofar as appealed from by plaintiffs, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated. The Appellate Division denied plaintiff tenant, 29 W. 25th Street Parking Corp., an extension of the lease term (as the lease requires in the case of the landlord being unable to give possession on the date specified), because it held that plaintiff caused the delay in possession by holding over at the expiration of the prior lease. However, that plaintiff did not cause the delay; it was caused by the holdover of the other plaintiff, W. 25th Street Parking Corp., with which plaintiff tenant, 29 W. 25th Street Parking Corp., had no connection until months later.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

29 W. 25th Street Parking Corp. v. Penn Post Parking

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 1085 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

29 W. 25th Street Parking Corp. v. Penn Post Parking

Case Details

Full title:29 W. 25TH STREET PARKING CORP. et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. PENN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 25, 1985

Citations

64 N.Y.2d 1085 (N.Y. 1985)
489 N.Y.S.2d 905
479 N.E.2d 250

Citing Cases

Palazzo v. Palazzo

She stated that plaintiff assured her that her attendance was unnecessary and that he would sign for both of…