From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

279679 Certificate Holders P. Corp. v. Spier

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 28, 1940
174 Misc. 553 (N.Y. App. Term 1940)

Opinion

June 28, 1940.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Lazarus Goldstone, for the appellant.

Spier Schwartz [ David W. Kirschen of counsel], for the respondents.


Pursuant to section 463 of the Civil Practice Act, if the jury disagreement relates to one or more but not to all of the issues submitted to the jury, the court may direct the retrial of the issues as to which the jury disagreed and the entry of the verdict of the jury on such issues as were agreed upon. However, the successful party on the issues which the jury agreed upon is not entitled to enter judgment in his favor until after the final disposition of the case.

Judgments and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant, and a retrial ordered of the issues as to which the jury disagreed.

All concur. Present — McCook, SHIENTAG and MILLER, JJ.


Summaries of

279679 Certificate Holders P. Corp. v. Spier

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 28, 1940
174 Misc. 553 (N.Y. App. Term 1940)
Case details for

279679 Certificate Holders P. Corp. v. Spier

Case Details

Full title:279679 CERTIFICATE HOLDERS PROTECTIVE CORP., Appellant, v. THE SPIER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1940

Citations

174 Misc. 553 (N.Y. App. Term 1940)
21 N.Y.S.2d 814

Citing Cases

Hoffberg v. FAWCETT PUBL'N

But in this case the jury did not render any verdict and I do not think the section even as amended goes far…

Hoffberg v. Fawcett Publications

But in this case the jury did not render any verdict and I do not think the section even as amended goes far…