holding that "standing cannot be conferred by agreement of the parties" and that "[i]f a party has no legally cognizable injury, the federal court lacks jurisdiction"
Summary of this case from Mittasch v. ReviczkyNo. 95-5101.
May 29, 1996.
Appeal from E.D.N.Y.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed
holding that "standing cannot be conferred by agreement of the parties" and that "[i]f a party has no legally cognizable injury, the federal court lacks jurisdiction"
Summary of this case from Mittasch v. ReviczkyFull title:183 Lorraine Street Associates, In Re; United Capital Corp. v. 183…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: May 29, 1996
Standing is not a matter of the parties' intent, and it does not arise by ipse dixit. See United Capital…
Matter of 183 Lorraine Street AssociatesAn appeal by Fischer and FBI was subsequently denied. See United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Assoc.,…