From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

17-1132, United States v. Santistevan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Apr 13, 2018
Dist/Ag docket: 1:16-CV-01685-REB (10th Cir. Apr. 13, 2018)

Summary

concluding § 2255 motion invoking Johnson II was not timely under § 2255(f) where defendant was convicted and sentenced under § 924(c)

Summary of this case from United States v. Harris

Opinion

Dist/Ag docket: 1:16-CV-01685-REB Dist/Ag docket: 1:07-CR-00435-REB

04-13-2018

RE: 17-1132, United States v. Santistevan, et al


Chris Wolpert Chief Deputy Clerk Roman Santistevan
FCI - Florence
P.O. Box 6000
Florence, CO 81226
#35360-013 Dear Appellant: Enclosed is a copy the court's final order issued today in this matter. Please contact this office if you have questions.

Sincerely,

/s/

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court cc: Gregory Allen Holloway

Judith Smith EAS/lab


Summaries of

17-1132, United States v. Santistevan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Apr 13, 2018
Dist/Ag docket: 1:16-CV-01685-REB (10th Cir. Apr. 13, 2018)

concluding § 2255 motion invoking Johnson II was not timely under § 2255(f) where defendant was convicted and sentenced under § 924(c)

Summary of this case from United States v. Harris
Case details for

17-1132, United States v. Santistevan

Case Details

Full title:RE: 17-1132, United States v. Santistevan, et al

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Date published: Apr 13, 2018

Citations

Dist/Ag docket: 1:16-CV-01685-REB (10th Cir. Apr. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Williams

The one-year clock on § 924(c)(3)(B) has not yet started. So in that sense, his motion is untimely, but…

United States v. Mullins

Id. United States v. Santistevan, 730 F. App'x 691, 693 (10th Cir. 2018) (quotation marks and citation…