§

Zhejiang Yankon Group, Ltd v. Cordelia Lighting, Inc.

13338191 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 25, 2015)
Zhejiang Yankon Group, Ltd v. Cordelia Lighting, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Taylor v. Sturgell

    553 U.S. 880 (2008)   Cited 3,243 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."

  2. Gonzalez v. Banco Cent. Corp.

    27 F.3d 751 (1st Cir. 1994)   Cited 172 times
    Holding that for claim preclusion to apply, a litigant first must have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate her claim

  3. Rule 301 - Presumptions in Civil Cases Generally

    Fed. R. Evid. 301   Cited 644 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Explaining presumptions

  4. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 544 times   889 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  5. Section 312 - Petitions

    35 U.S.C. § 312   Cited 128 times   118 Legal Analyses
    Governing inter partes reexamination

  6. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 45 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution

  7. Section 42.62 - Applicability of the Federal rules of evidence

    37 C.F.R. § 42.62   Cited 5 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a)Generally. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply to a proceeding. (b)Exclusions. Those portions of the Federal Rules of Evidence relating to criminal proceedings, juries, and other matters not relevant to proceedings under this subpart shall not apply. (c)Modifications in terminology. Unless otherwise clear from context, the following terms of the Federal Rules of Evidence shall be construed as indicated: Appellate court means United States Court

  8. Section 42.106 - Filing date

    37 C.F.R. § 42.106   Cited 1 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a)Complete petition. A petition to institute inter partes review will not be accorded a filing date until the petition satisfies all of the following requirements: (1) Complies with § 42.104 ; (2) Effects service of the petition on the correspondence address of record as provided in § 42.105(a) ; and (3) Is accompanied by the fee to institute required in § 42.15(a) . (b)Incomplete petition. Where a party files an incomplete petition, no filing date will be accorded, and the Office will dismiss the