ยง

Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.

96 N.L.R.B. 407 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. P. Lorillard Co.

    314 U.S. 512 (1942)   Cited 76 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued December 18, 19, 1941. Decided January 5, 1942. Whether an employer should be required to bargain with a union previously selected as employees' bargaining representative or, in view of lapse of time and changed conditions, a new election should be held is a question for decision by the Board and not by the Circuit Court of Appeals. P. 513. 117 F.2d 921, reversed. CERTIORARI, 313 U.S. 557, to review a judgment entered

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.

    110 F.2d 632 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 60 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Manufacturing Company, 4 Cir., 110 F.2d 632, 640, decided March 11, 1940, the court, in discussing a similar contention, said: "* * * In such case it is reasonable to presume that the authority of the bargaining agent continues until the contrary be shown [citing cases]."

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.

    165 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 44 times

    No. 10411. January 26, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board, for enforcement of its order directing J.H. Allison Co. to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively concerning so-called "merit wage increases" with a labor union, as exclusive representative and bargaining agent of its production workers and to grant no merit wage increases to such employees without prior consultation with the union

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 34 times

    No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,

  6. Aluminum Ore Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    131 F.2d 485 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 26 times

    No. 7995. November 30, 1942. Petition to Review and Set Aside and on Request for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by Aluminum Ore Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which asked that the order be enforced. Petition to vacate denied, order modified, and as modified enforced. Bruce A. Campbell, of East St. Louis, Ill., and Frank B. Ingersoll, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Kramer, Campbell, Costello Wiechert, of East St. Louis,

  7. Smith v. Carter Carburetor Corporation

    130 F.2d 555 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 25 times

    No. 7694. Argued October 8, 1941. Reargued February 19, 1942. Decided September 5, 1942. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 6, 1942. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware; John P. Nields, Judge. Suit under 35 U.S.C.A. ยง 63 by Stuyvesant C. Smith and another against the Carter Carburetor Corporation to obtain a patent. From a decree of the District Court, 36 F. Supp. 102, dismissing the complaint, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed. Arthur H. Boettcher, of

  8. Black Diamond S.S. Corp. v. Natl. Labor R. BD

    94 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 24 times
    In Black Diamond S. S. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 875, while an election was being held by the Board to determine which of two rival unions represented a majority of the men, one of the unions demanded that the company bargain with it.

  9. Great Southern T. Co. v. National L. Rel. Bd.

    139 F.2d 984 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4874. January 10, 1944. Petition for rule to show cause, to adjudge in contempt, and for other relief. Proceedings on petition by National Labor Relations Board for an order adjudging the Great Southern Trucking Company and L.A. Raulerson in contempt of a decree enforcing an order of the Board. Order issued. Winthrop A. Johns and A. Norman Somers, Attys., both of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief)

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swift Co.

    162 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1947)   Cited 12 times

    No. 9228. Argued February 18, 1947. Decided June 11, 1947. On petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Swift Company, respondent. Petition granted, and decree entered directing enforcement of order as modified. Elizabeth Weston, of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris A. Glushien, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel