Westinghouse Electric Corp.

41 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,017 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. Teamsters v. United States

    431 U.S. 324 (1977)   Cited 4,634 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff who did not apply for a position can still make prima facie showing if he can demonstrate his application for the position would have been futile
  3. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,204 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.

    415 U.S. 36 (1974)   Cited 2,868 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA
  5. University of California Regents v. Bakke

    438 U.S. 265 (1978)   Cited 1,180 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff suffered an injury when he could not compete for all places in his entering medical school class
  6. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"
  7. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  9. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA
  10. National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Morton

    498 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 358 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Finding a likelihood of substantial competitive harm when disclosure would potentially enable competitors to underbid the plaintiff
  11. Section 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5   Cited 27,294 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding charges must be made in writing, under oath, and contain all information as the Commission requires
  12. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,361 times   558 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
  13. Section 2000e-8 - Investigations

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-8   Cited 402 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the EEOC to "enter into written agreements" with state and local agencies to promote "effective enforcement" of the Act
  14. Section 1601.20 - Negotiated settlement

    29 C.F.R. § 1601.20   Cited 33 times
    Stating the Commission may encourage settlement prior to the issuance of a reasonable-cause determination and authorizing certain directors, or their designees, to sign such settlements
  15. Section 60-2.11 - Organizational profile

    41 C.F.R. § 60-2.11   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a)Purpose. An organizational profile is a depiction of the staffing pattern within an establishment. It is one method contractors use to determine whether barriers to equal employment opportunity exist in their organizations. The profile provides an overview of the workforce at the establishment that may assist in identifying organizational units where women or minorities are underrepresented or concentrated. The contractor must use either the organizational display or the workforce analysis as

  16. Section 60-2.12 - Job group analysis

    41 C.F.R. § 60-2.12   Cited 12 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a) Purpose: A job group analysis is a method of combining job titles within the contractor's establishment. This is the first step in the contractor's comparison of the representation of minorities and women in its workforce with the estimated availability of minorities and women qualified to be employed. (b) In the job group analysis, jobs at the establishment with similar content, wage rates, and opportunities, must be combined to form job groups. Similarity of content refers to the duties and