§

Wanda J. Ingram, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Appeal No. 01A51619 Agency No. 03-0369

01a51619 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 28, 2005)
Wanda J. Ingram, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Appeal No. 01A51619 Agency No. 03-0369

3 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. Postal Service Bd. of Govs. v. Aikens

    460 U.S. 711 (1983)   Cited 2,417 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "[t]here will seldom be `eyewitness' testimony to the employer's mental process," evidence of the employer's discriminatory attitude in general is relevant and admissible to prove discrimination

  2. Bauer v. Bailar

    647 F.2d 1037 (10th Cir. 1981)   Cited 81 times
    Holding employer's subjective hiring criteria to be nonpretextual where the subjective factors considered were articulated and generally relevant to the job

  3. Canham v. Oberlin College

    666 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Canham v. Oberlin College, 666 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977, 102 S.Ct. 2242, 72 L.Ed.2d 851 (1982), the claim was sex discrimination.