§

Wallick and Schwalm Co.

95 N.L.R.B. 1262 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Wallick and Schwalm Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  2. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Reynolds Internat. Pen

    162 F.2d 680 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 31 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Reynolds International Pen Co., 7 Cir., 162 F.2d 680, this Court decided that employees who engage in a walkout because of a dissatisfaction with a change in foreman, are not protected by the Act and are subject to discharge.

  4. Stewart Die Casting v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    114 F.2d 849 (7th Cir. 1940)   Cited 29 times
    In Stewart Die Casting Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 114 F.2d 849, 858, the court conditioned enforcement of the Board's order upon a redetermination of the bargaining agent particularly because of the length of time which had elapsed between the hearing and the Board's order to bargain.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. E.A. Laboratories

    188 F.2d 885 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 15 times

    No. 79, Docket 21773. Argued April 3, 1951. Decided May 7, 1951. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Harvey B. Diamond, all of Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, petitioner. Olvany, Eisner Donnelly, New York City (Merwin Lewis and Robert F. Welch, New York City, of counsel), for E.A. Laboratories, Inc., respondent. Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges. AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge. The

  6. Reliance Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    125 F.2d 311 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 19 times

    No. 7580. December 20, 1941. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1942. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Reliance Manufacturing Company for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the National Labor Relations Board requested enforcement of its order. Petition for enforcement allowed, conditioned upon modification of order. Paul Y. Davis, Ernest R. Baltzell, Wm. G. Sparks, and Gustav H. Dongus, all of Indianapolis

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Aladdin Industries

    125 F.2d 377 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 9 times

    No. 7670. January 16, 1942. Rehearing Denied February 19, 1942. On Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Aladdin Industries, Incorporated. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Robert B. Watts, NLRB, of Washington, D.C., I.S. Dorfman, NLRB, of Chicago, Ill., and Mortimer Kollender, NLRB, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Reynolds Wire Co.

    121 F.2d 627 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 8 times

    No. 7604. June 12, 1941. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board against the Reynolds Wire Company. Order modified and, as modified, directed to be enforced. Robert B. Watts, of Washington, D.C., I.S. Dorfman, of Chicago, Ill., and Lewis M. Gill, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert L. Bracken, of Dixon, Ill., and Roger Robb, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before