Wal-mart Stores, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 324 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 534 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Auto. Workers v. Wis. Board
336 U.S. 245 (1949) Cited 209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that issuance of injunction by state labor relations authority that orders state employees back to work does not violate Thirteenth Amendment because employees had the right to quit employment
National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
156 F.3d 1268 (D.C. Cir. 1998) Cited 6 times
Upholding the Board's finding that a company committed an unfair labor practice by videotaping union rallies without sufficient justification
Roseville Dodge, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
882 F.2d 1355 (8th Cir. 1989) Cited 6 times
No. 88-5319. Submitted March 14, 1989. Decided August 23, 1989. Rehearing Denied September 11, 1989. David R. Hols, Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner. John Fawley, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. GIBSON and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Roseville Dodge seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board decision holding that two separate work stoppages by an unrepresented
N.L.R.B. v. McEver Engineering, Inc.
784 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1986) Cited 8 times
Holding that "[b]efore an employer can be said to have discriminated against its employees for their protected activity, the Board must show that the supervisor responsible for the alleged discriminatory action knew about the" union activity
N.L.R.B. v. Robertson Industries
560 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 8 times
Protesting working conditions is protected by Section 7
Section 163 - Right to strike preserved
29 U.S.C. § 163 Cited 116 times
Preserving the right to strike

Wal-mart Stores, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Holding that issuance of injunction by state labor relations authority that orders state employees back to work does not violate Thirteenth Amendment because employees had the right to quit employment

Upholding the Board's finding that a company committed an unfair labor practice by videotaping union rallies without sufficient justification

Holding that "[b]efore an employer can be said to have discriminated against its employees for their protected activity, the Board must show that the supervisor responsible for the alleged discriminatory action knew about the" union activity

Protesting working conditions is protected by Section 7

Preserving the right to strike