§
Wade & Paxton

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Corp.

    328 U.S. 275 (1946)   Cited 485 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 “is to be liberally construed for the benefit of those who left private life to serve their country in its hour of great need”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

  3. North Whittier Heights C. v. National L.R. BD

    109 F.2d 76 (9th Cir. 1940)   Cited 62 times
    In North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 76, 80 we discussed the nature and functions of commercial packing houses and gave full recognition to the principle that the nature of the work modified by the custom of doing it determines whether the worker is or is not an agricultural laborer.

  4. J. B. Blanton Company v. Lowe

    415 S.W.2d 376 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)   Cited 14 times
    In J. B. Blanton Company v. Lowe, Ky., 415 S.W.2d 376, this court upheld the appellee Commission and its order refusing to reclassify a lot south of the 300-foot zone involved in the present case.

  5. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod

    109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."

  6. National Lbr. R. Bd. v. George P. Pilling Son

    119 F.2d 32 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 26 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. George P. Pilling Son Co. (119 F.2d 32) the court said, at page 37: "there must be common willingness among the parties to discuss freely and fully their respective claims and demands and, when these are opposed, to justify them on reason.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Blanton Co.

    121 F.2d 564 (8th Cir. 1941)   Cited 16 times

    No. 506. July 8, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order against the Blanton Company. Order of enforcement directed to be entered with modification as requested by the Board. Abraham J. Harris, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett and

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lane Cotton Mills

    111 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 8 times

    No. 9071. May 9, 1940. Rehearing Denied July 24, 1940. Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against the Lane Cotton Mills Company, a corporation, for the enforcement of an order issued by petitioner pursuant to National Labor Relations Act § 10(c), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(c). Petition granted. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel