§
W. T. Grant Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  3. Roberts v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 18942. Argued March 4, 1965. Decided July 21, 1965. Mr. Theodore J. St. Antoine, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. J. Albert Woll and Robert C. Mayer, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before FAHY, DANAHER and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges. FAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  4. International Wdwkr., Am., 3-10 v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 11 times

    No. 20526. Argued April 14, 1967. Decided June 15, 1967. Petition for Rehearing Denied August 17, 1967. Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. George J. Tichy, Spokane, Wash., was on the brief for intervenor

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Morris Fishman and Sons, Inc.

    278 F.2d 792 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12986. Argued December 7, 1959. Decided May 13, 1960. Melvin Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Avins, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James L. Price, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richman, Price Jamieson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. BIGGS, Chief Judge. This is a petition

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wemyss

    212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Wemyss, 212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954), we declined to approve a Board finding that an employer interfered with and dominated the administration of an in-house committee system.

  7. Local 901 v. Compton

    291 F.2d 793 (1st Cir. 1961)   Cited 9 times

    No. 5771. June 15, 1961. George L. Weasler, Santurce, P.R., for appellant. Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and James T. Youngblood, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellee. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. Sitting by designation. WOODBURY, Chief Judge. Editorial El Imparcial, Inc., a Puerto Rican corporation, filed an amended charge with