§

Verizon New York, Inc., Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Verizon Avenue Corp., Verizon Advanced

369 N.L.R.B. 108 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
Verizon New York, Inc., Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Verizon Avenue Corp., Verizon Advanced

16 Cited authorities

  1. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 431 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 321 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 220 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  5. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  6. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  7. Guard Publishing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    571 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing an employer's challenge to only the unfavorable portions of an NLRB ruling

  8. Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 12 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

  9. Hyundai Am. Shipping Agency, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    805 F.3d 309 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 2 times
    Declining to endorse the Board's "novel view" but holding that Hyundai's rule prohibiting discussion of all matters under investigation "was so broad and undifferentiated that the Board reasonably concluded that Hyundai did not present a legitimate business justification for it"

  10. Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B

    81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

  11. Section 654 - Duties of employers and employees

    29 U.S.C. § 654   Cited 610 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to "comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this chapter"

  12. Section 208 - Acts affecting a personal financial interest

    18 U.S.C. § 208   Cited 189 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting executive branch officials from participating in government decisions in which they have a financial interest