§

US Foods, Inc.

27-CA-158614 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 17, 2016)
US Foods, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 651 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. N.L.R.B. v. American Dir. Boring

    383 F. App'x 594 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1 times

    No. 09-1194. Submitted: December 17, 2009. Filed: June 24, 2010. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, Kellie Isbell, Meredith Jason, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Ralph P. Tremain, National Labor Relations Board, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner. Christopher Grant, Schuchat Cook, St. Louis, MO, for Intervenor. Bryan M. Kaemmerer, Michael E. Kaemmerer, McCarthy Leonard, Chester-field, MO, for Respondent

  6. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming bargaining order "in view of the serious and pervasive violations disclosed in the record"

  7. Intern. Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B

    759 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times

    No. 84-7356. Argued and Submitted February 11, 1985. Decided May 13, 1985. David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Kathleen Murray, Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. James A. Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Petition to Review an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY, ALARCON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. NELSON, Circuit Judge: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mississippi Power Light Co.

    769 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 4 times
    Explaining rationale for rule

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Raytheon Co.

    918 F.2d 249 (1st Cir. 1990)

    No. 90-1195. Heard September 14, 1990. Decided November 2, 1990. Thomas Royall Smith, with whom Pamela E. Tracey and Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler Krupman, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. David A. Fleischer, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on brief, for petitioner. Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, and CYR, Circuit Judge