§

United Technologies Corp.

296 N.L.R.B. 571 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
United Technologies Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  4. Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    754 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 83-7717, 83-7813 and 83-7840. Argued and Submitted September 13, 1984. Decided October 31, 1984. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En banc March 11, 1985. Stefan M. Mason, Mason Mason, Los Angeles, Cal., Sanford N. Nathan, Neyhart, Anderson, Nussbaum, Reilly Freitas, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Susan Williams, Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the United States National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRILL, ALARCON