United Steel Workers; Local 2556, Steelworkers

6 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B
412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 30 times
Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee
Standard Oil Company v. N.L.R.B
322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 22 times
In Standard Oil Co. v. NLRB, 322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963), four oil refineries of the same company constituted separate bargaining units; one was represented by an international union and the other three by locals thereof.
Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B
415 F.2d 174 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 12 times
No. 19508. September 4, 1969. Thomas M. Vogt, of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon Vogt, St. Paul, Minn., for petitioner, Thomas J. Scheuerman, St. Paul, Minn., on the briefs. John I. Taylor, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Michael N. Sohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief. Before VOGEL, MATTHES and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. In this proceeding, the National
United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B
298 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 11 times
In United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B., 298 F.2d 873, 877-78 (5th Cir. 1962), the court held that a union's insistence during bargaining on a common expiration date for its own as well as its sister unions' contracts was not unlawful.

United Steel Workers; Local 2556, Steelworkers

6 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee

Standard Oil Company v. N.L.R.B

In Standard Oil Co. v. NLRB, 322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963), four oil refineries of the same company constituted separate bargaining units; one was represented by an international union and the other three by locals thereof.

Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

In United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B., 298 F.2d 873, 877-78 (5th Cir. 1962), the court held that a union's insistence during bargaining on a common expiration date for its own as well as its sister unions' contracts was not unlawful.