United Site Services of California, Inc.

28 Cited authorities

  1. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale

    463 U.S. 491 (1983)   Cited 276 times
    Holding that the NLRA does not preempt state law contract actions by replacement workers to enforce terms of an employment contract
  2. ITT CONTINENTAL BAK. v. WILLIAM INGLIS SONS BAK

    459 U.S. 825 (1982)   Cited 254 times
    Finding it unnecessary to reach that issue
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 321 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 232 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
  5. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
  6. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Van Lines

    409 U.S. 48 (1972)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that a statement that striking employees "are being permanently replaced" constituted an unlawful discharge when permanent replacements had not been hired
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Augusta Bakery Corp.

    957 F.2d 1467 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that the replacements were temporary because, although the replacements were told that "if they worked out and did their job, they had a job," the testimony of the replacements indicated that they did not understand themselves to be permanent employees
  10. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,304 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  12. Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 901   Cited 5,274 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication
  13. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,294 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity
  14. Section 163 - Right to strike preserved

    29 U.S.C. § 163   Cited 116 times
    Preserving the right to strike