UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 135, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNI

10 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,204 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,074 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
  3. Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild

    525 U.S. 33 (1998)   Cited 417 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discretionary actions taken by the union on a member's behalf are not arbitrary even where the member can demonstrate they were "erroneous or unsuccessful."
  4. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
  5. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  6. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  7. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act
  8. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
  9. Intern. Union of Elevator, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    665 F.2d 376 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 3 times
    Stating that the proviso to section 8(b) "has been interpreted to allow enforcement of union rules with a legitimate purpose, which do not conflict with national labor policy, so long as members are free to escape union discipline by resignation" (emphasis added; footnote omitted)
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Int. L. W. Union Local 13

    581 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 3 times

    No. 77-2313. July 21, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 19, 1978. William F. Wachter, Washington, D.C. (argued), for petitioner. Martha Goldin (argued), Hollywood, Cal., for respondent. Application For Enforcement of An Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge. Hon. Marion J. Callister, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge: The underlying