Thornhill v. Alabama

Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights

A.F. of L. v. Swing

In AFL v. Swing, 312 U.S. 321, 61 S.Ct. 568, 85 L.Ed. 855 (1941), the Illinois Supreme Court had enjoined picketing by a labor union on the ground that there was no dispute between the employer and his immediate employees.

Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl

Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing

Amer. Foundries v. Tri-City Council

Holding that the Clayton Act's provisions on injunctive relief applied to pending cases

Carpenters Union v. Ritter's Cafe

Upholding state law outlawing secondary picketing

Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

Matter of Int'l Nickel v. N.Y. Plaza Bldg