§

Union Tank Car Company

369 N.L.R.B. 120 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
Union Tank Car Company

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 321 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  3. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    835 F.3d 536 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 15–1433/1611 07-19-2016 Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., Petitioner/Cross–Respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross–Petitioner, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervening Respondent. ARGUED: Joseph J. Torres, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner/Cross–Respondent. Valerie L. Collins, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. Kristin Seifert Watson, Cloppert

  4. Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

  5. Intertape Polymer Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 2015)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that "even if . . . leaflet[t]ing is construed as 'out of the ordinary,' is plainly insufficient to establish . . . coercion"

  6. United Services Auto. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    387 F.3d 908 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 16 times
    Applying Essex rule where company banned solicitation and distribution “at any time in the work area and only during nonworking hours in non-work areas”

  7. St. Margaret v. N.L.R.B

    519 F.3d 373 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 07-2752, 07-3110. Argued February 22, 2008. Decided March 11, 2008. Jeffrey C. Kauffman (argued), Seyfarth Shaw, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent. Joseph A. Barker, Chicago, IL, Linda J. Dreeben, Usha Dheenan (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and POSNER, Circuit Judges. POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Labor Board found that St. Margaret, which owns and operates