§

UFCW, LOCAL 700 (KROGER)

361 N.L.R.B. 420 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
UFCW, LOCAL 700 (KROGER)

25 Cited authorities

  1. Knox v. Serv. Employees Int'l Union

    567 U.S. 298 (2012)   Cited 844 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a post-certiorari offer to class members to fully refund the collection of disputed union dues did not moot the case

  2. Barrentine v. Ark.-Best Freight Sys.

    450 U.S. 728 (1981)   Cited 1,680 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fair Labor Standards Act claims may be brought in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

  3. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,071 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

  4. Abood v. Detroit Board of Education

    431 U.S. 209 (1977)   Cited 865 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compelling nonmember employees to contribute to union's political activities infringes employees' First Amendment rights

  5. Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild

    525 U.S. 33 (1998)   Cited 415 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discretionary actions taken by the union on a member's behalf are not arbitrary even where the member can demonstrate they were "erroneous or unsuccessful."

  6. Teachers v. Hudson

    475 U.S. 292 (1986)   Cited 408 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment restrains government-compelled exactions of money

  7. Humphrey v. Moore

    375 U.S. 335 (1964)   Cited 760 times
    Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

  8. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 880 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  9. United States v. United Foods, Inc.

    533 U.S. 405 (2001)   Cited 194 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that regulations forcing mushroom producers to fund generic advertising violated the First Amendment, even though they "[did] not compel the expression of political or ideological views"

  10. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 275 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  11. Section 1601 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1601   Cited 7,862 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that TILA's disclosure requirements exist “so that the consumer will be able to compare more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the uninformed use of credit”

  12. Section 343 - Misbranded food

    21 U.S.C. § 343   Cited 576 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Setting labeling requirements for food products