Uber Technologies, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013) Cited 141 times 145 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener
405 U.S. 117 (1972) Cited 83 times
Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner
Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) Cited 66 times 103 Legal Analyses
Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001) Cited 33 times
Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"
Alston v. Merit
255 F. App'x 517 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
No. 2007-3191. November 13, 2007. Appealed from United States Merit Systems Protection Board. Gilbert J. Alston, of New York, NY, pro se. Stephanie M. Conley, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, and Rosa M. Koppel, Deputy General Counsel. Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER and LINN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Gilbert Alston seeks review of a decision of
Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title
9 U.S.C. § 1 Cited 12,090 times 210 Legal Analyses
Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,084 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Uber Technologies, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner

Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

Alston v. Merit

Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"