§

Tyson's Foods, Inc.

172 N.L.R.B. 2008 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Tyson's Foods, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.

    309 U.S. 261 (1940)   Cited 211 times
    In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.

  3. Wellington Mill, W. Point Mfg. v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 579 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 49 times
    Stating that General Counsel's "refusal to [issue a complaint] is final and unappealable"

  4. Philip Carey Mfg., v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 15289, 15330. March 31, 1964. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief; E.J. Fasold, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C., for International Union, etc. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for N.L.R.B. Before

  5. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    289 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 43 times

    No. 15384. Argued April 11, 1960. Decided June 30, 1960. Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Miss Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent. Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and

  6. Local 282, Int'l Bro., Teamsters, v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 33 times
    Charging party has no right to a hearing on its objections

  7. Piasecki Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 31 times

    Nos. 12912, 12995. Argued February 1, 1960. Decided June 20, 1960. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing in No. 12912, August 26, 1960. Francis E. Marshall, Philadelphia, Pa. (James J. Davis, Davis, Marshall Crumlish, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner Piasecki Aircraft Corp. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C. (Ernest S. Wilson, Jr., Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for petitioners UAW-AFL-CIO and its Local 840. Allison W. Brown Jr., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas

  8. Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  9. United Steelworkers of America v. N.L.R.B

    393 F.2d 661 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 21043, 21338. Argued February 5, 1968. Decided March 19, 1968. Mr. Melvin S. Schwarzwald, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom Messrs. Joseph E. Finley, Cleveland, Ohio, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,043 and intervenor in No. 21,338. Mr. Elliot Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 21,043. Mr. Gary Green, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L

  10. International Un., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    231 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 21 times
    In UAW v. NLRB, 231 F.2d 237 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 908, 77 S.Ct. 146, 1 L.Ed.2d 117 (1956), we required that a charging party be allowed to submit evidence in a full hearing on its objections to a proposed settlement where the disagreement concerned a stipulation of facts upon which the settlement was based.