§

TRUCK DRIVERS, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 100, AFFILIATED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHER

370 N.L.R.B. 15 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
TRUCK DRIVERS, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 100, AFFILIATED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHER

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,623 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,196 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 880 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Teamsters “General” Local Union No. 200

    723 F.3d 778 (7th Cir. 2013)   Cited 11 times
    Discussing a union's responsibilities under the duty of fair representation

  7. Int'l All. of Theatrical Stage Emps. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    885 F.3d 1123 (8th Cir. 2018)   Cited 2 times

    No. 16-3686 No. 16-3940 03-26-2018 INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, MOVING PICTURE TECHNICIANS, ARTISTS AND ALLIED CRAFTS OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND CANADA, LOCAL UNION NO. 151, Petitioner Katie Martens v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, its Territories and Canada, Local Union

  8. Lucas v. N.L.R.B

    333 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 13 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  9. Jacoby v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.3d 301 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 10 times
    Stating that unions have a duty to use “ ‘objective criteria’ and ‘consistent standards' ” in the operation of hiring-halls

  10. STAGEHANDS REFER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELA

    315 F. App'x 318 (2d Cir. 2009)   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 07-2126-ag (L), 07-3103-ag (xap). March 12, 2009. Petition of Petitioners-Cross-Respondents for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated August 31, 2006. Petition of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") for the enforcement of that Order. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED and the cross-petition for enforcement is GRANTED. Leon M. Rosenblatt, Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt, West