§

Trinity Services Group, Inc.

368 N.L.R.B. 115 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
Trinity Services Group, Inc.

26 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Flying Food Group v. N.L.R.B

    471 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that, in administrative proceedings, notice “is sufficient if the [petitioner] understood the issue and was afforded full opportunity to justify its conduct during the course of the litigation”

  3. United States v. Peacock

    654 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 71 times
    In United States v. Peacock, 654 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1981), a witness testified about comments made by her deceased husband concerning a telephone conversation he had just finished.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ingredion Inc.

    930 F.3d 509 (D.C. Cir. 2019)   Cited 13 times
    Finding no reason to reverse the Board's decision where the company "received a ‘full and fair opportunity to litigate the matter’ " and failed to identify any instance of prejudice

  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  6. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence

  7. Novelis Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    885 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2018)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 16-3076 (Lead) 16-3570 (XAP) August Term 2017 03-15-2018 NOVELIS CORPORATION, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, and John Tesoriero, Michael Malone, Richard Farrands, and Andrew Duschen, Intervenors, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, Intervenor. Kurtis A. Powell & Robert T. Dumbacher, Hunton & Williams, LLP, Atlanta, GA; Kenneth L

  8. United Food Commercial Workers v. N.L.R.B

    447 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that stating "I'm just tired of this Union shit and I'm ready to get my company back where it belong" two days before firing a union election observer "exhibits powerful antiunion animus"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pratt & Whitney Air Craft Division, United Technologies Corp.

    789 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 33 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer statement that the union was "thoughtless and irresponsible" and that it was on "a collision course" was neither coercive nor implied that employees should abandon the union

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours

    750 F.2d 524 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    Finding that a supervisor's act of questioning an employee as to why he supported the union, as well as the supervisor's statement to the employee that he had supervisor potential if he did not support the union, rose to the level of coercive conduct

  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,124 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  12. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,886 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities