Trinity Health - Michigan d/b/a St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital

14 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 729 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 708 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
  4. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Watts Indus., Inc.

    417 F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 343 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "to show a [contract] dispute," the plaintiff "must show that [the defendant] has acted, or has threatened to act, in a manner inconsistent with [the plaintiff's] interpretation of the contract"
  5. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 314 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.

    711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control
  7. Vulcan Hart Corp.

    718 F.2d 269 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 43 times
    Holding “Rule 408 excludes evidence of settlement offers only if such evidence is offered to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim under negotiation”
  8. Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    907 F.2d 963 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 30 times
    In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.
  9. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    814 F.3d 752 (5th Cir. 2016)   Cited 2 times

    No. 15–60063. 02-25-2016 DIXIE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Petitioner/Cross–Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. David J. Shelby, II (argued), Mary Lenore Feeney, Esq., Attorney, Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, for Petitioner/Cross–Respondent. Linda Dreeben, Esq., Deputy Associate General Counsel, Julie Brock Broido, Supervisory Attorney, Michael Randall Hickson (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Kathryn M. McKinney, U

  10. Hill-Rom Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    957 F.2d 454 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 89-3721, 90-1236. Argued November 2, 1990. Decided March 6, 1992. William R. Stewart, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Robert I. Tendrich (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C. William T. Little, James S. Robles, N.L.R.B., Region 25, Indianapolis, Ind., for N.L.R.B. Kenneth J. Yerkes, Robert K. Bellamy (argued), Barnes Thornburg, Indianapolis, Ind., for Hill-Rom Co., Inc. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,046 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB