§

The Rogers Mfg. Co.

178 N.L.R.B. 429 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
The Rogers Mfg. Co.

2 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Rogers Mfg. Co.

    406 F.2d 1106 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times
    In Rogers, the court, holding that pro-union activity was relevant, ultimately concluded the Board's order lacked substantial evidentiary support.

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. Tex. St. Castings

    255 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14459. May 15, 1958. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1958. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.B. Fisher, J.D. McLaughlin, Paris, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In May 1954, we entered a decree modifying and enforcing