The M. H. Davidson Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
  3. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. P. Lorillard Co.

    314 U.S. 512 (1942)   Cited 76 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued December 18, 19, 1941. Decided January 5, 1942. Whether an employer should be required to bargain with a union previously selected as employees' bargaining representative or, in view of lapse of time and changed conditions, a new election should be held is a question for decision by the Board and not by the Circuit Court of Appeals. P. 513. 117 F.2d 921, reversed. CERTIORARI, 313 U.S. 557, to review a judgment entered

  5. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Crown Can Co.

    138 F.2d 263 (8th Cir. 1943)   Cited 19 times

    No. 12547. October 25, 1943. Rehearing Denied November 9, 1943. On Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order directed to the Crown Can Company at its Nebraska City, Nebraska, plant. Order enforced. Russell Packard, Atty. for National Labor Relations Board, of Chicago, Ill. (Robert B. Watts, General Counsel; Ernest A. Gross, Associate General Counsel; Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. General

  7. D.H. Holmes Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    179 F.2d 876 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 11 times

    No. 12745. February 18, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 28, 1950. Leon Sarpy, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Andrew P. Carter, Attorney, New Orleans, La., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. McCORD, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by D.H. Holmes Company, Ltd., a Louisiana Corporation, to review and set aside an order

  8. Peoples Motor Express v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    165 F.2d 903 (4th Cir. 1948)   Cited 9 times

    No. 5687. January 31, 1948. On Petition to Review an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Peoples Motor Express, Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to set aside an order of the Board, wherein Board in its answer requested enforcement. Order modified and enforced. J.F. Flowers and Henry L. Strickland both of Charlotte, N.C., for petitioner. Ben Grodsky, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, and

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Todd Co.

    173 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 7 times

    No. 24, Docket 20990. March 30, 1949. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Todd Company, Inc., for the enforcement of an order of the board. Enforcement granted. The Board seeks enforcement of its order of October 4, 1946. That order and the Board's opinion are reported in 71 N.L.R.B. 192. Pursuant to an election duly held in February 1944, the union became the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees. On December 5, 1944, the Board filed its complaint. December

  10. Lebanon Steel Foundry v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    130 F.2d 404 (D.C. Cir. 1942)   Cited 12 times

    No. 7990. Decided June 29, 1942. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 12, 1942. See ___ U.S. ___, 63 S.Ct. 58, 87 L.Ed. ___. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Lebanon Steel Foundry against National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the board. Enforcement ordered. Mr. Hugh P. McFadden, of Bethlehem, Pa., for petitioner. Mr. Ernest A. Gross, Assistant General Counsel, with whom Mr. Robert B. Watts, General Counsel, Mr