§
The Lorge School

24 Cited authorities

  1. United Student Aid Funds v. Espinosa

    559 U.S. 260 (2010)   Cited 1,877 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rule 60(b) applies "in the rare instance where a judgment is premised . . . on a violation of due process that deprives a party of notice or the opportunity to be heard"

  2. Ins. Corp. of Ir. v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee

    456 U.S. 694 (1982)   Cited 3,955 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that unlike subject matter jurisdiction, a defect in personal jurisdiction can be waived

  3. Nemaizer v. Baker

    793 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 1,353 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice was an adjudication on the merits that barred further federal court proceedings

  4. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  5. Chicot County Dist. v. Bank

    308 U.S. 371 (1940)   Cited 1,032 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts' determinations of their own jurisdiction, "while open to direct review, may not be assailed collaterally"

  6. Stoll v. Gottlieb

    305 U.S. 165 (1938)   Cited 800 times
    Holding that “[a]fter a party has his day in court, with opportunity to present his evidence and his view of the law, a collateral attack upon the decision as to jurisdiction there rendered merely retries the issue previously determined”

  7. Corbett v. MacDonald Moving Services

    124 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 143 times
    Holding that collateral attacks on bankruptcy court's jurisdiction are barred by res judicata

  8. U.S. v. Bigford

    365 F.3d 859 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a judgment may be attacked in a collateral proceeding "on the basis that it was rendered without jurisdiction"

  9. Cornell v. T.V. Development Corp.

    17 N.Y.2d 69 (N.Y. 1966)   Cited 115 times

    Argued January 11, 1966 Decided February 24, 1966 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, PAUL J. WIDLITZ, J. Stanley Goldman for appellant. Jack C. Brill for respondent. SCILEPPI, J. Plaintiff was hired as General Manager by the defendant T.V. Development Corp. for a five-year period starting in March, 1962, at an annual salary of $20,000. The employment contract contained covenants not to compete and that all inventions by the plaintiff would be

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.