The Jacobs Manufacturing Co.

10 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board
170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949) Cited 156 times 2 Legal Analyses
Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
Timken Roller Bearing v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
161 F.2d 949 (6th Cir. 1947) Cited 31 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 949, relied upon by plaintiff, arbitrability of the question of contracting out work was recognized as an interpretation of a management function clause of the agreement there involved.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Newark Morning L
120 F.2d 262 (3d Cir. 1941) Cited 24 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Newark Morning L. Co., 3 Cir., 120 F.2d 262, 268, 137 A.L.R. 849, this court, passing upon the right of an employee to reinstatement with back pay stated its conclusion that rights under the Act were public rights, though expressly reserving judgment upon the question whether the law of New Jersey might afford the claimant in the cited case a forum for the redress of her private grievances.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Ohio Calcium Co.
133 F.2d 721 (6th Cir. 1943) Cited 21 times
No. 9217. February 19, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the Ohio Calcium Company. Decree in accordance with opinion. Fannie M. Boyls, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Ruth Weyand, and Fannie M. Boyls, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert T. Caldwell, of Ashland, Ky. (Robert T. Caldwell and Porter M
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Algoma Plywood V
121 F.2d 602 (7th Cir. 1941) Cited 22 times
No. 7597. June 11, 1941. Rehearing Denied August 5, 1941. On Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the Algoma Plywood Veneer Company. Petition denied. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, of Washington, D.C., I.S. Dorfman, of Chicago, Ill., and Leslie Clifford, of Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Robert C. Bassett, of Green Bay, Wis., for respondent. Before
Wilson Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
115 F.2d 759 (8th Cir. 1940) Cited 19 times
No. 469. December 2, 1940. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Wilson Co., Incorporated, against the National Labor Relations Board to set aside an order of the Board requiring collective bargaining with United Packing House Workers Local Industrial Union No. 51 wherein the Board sought enforcement of its order. Enforcement of order directed. James D. Cooney, of Chicago, Ill. (Marshal Wiedel and L.R. Simpson, both of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Abbott Worsted Mills
127 F.2d 438 (1st Cir. 1942) Cited 14 times
No. 3752. April 23, 1942. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered by the board against Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc. Decree enforcing order. William S. Gordon, Jr., of Boston, Mass. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, and Thomas E. Shroyer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John P. Carleton, of Manchester, N.H. (McLane, Davis Carleton, of Manchester
Cross v. Nee
18 F. Supp. 589 (W.D. Mo. 1937) Cited 4 times
No. 9077. January 5, 1937. Watson, Ess, Groner, Barnett Whittaker, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff. Maurice M. Milligan, U.S. Dist. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant. REEVES, District Judge. The question presented is whether for the purpose of determining the tax liability of the estate of the deceased, paragraph "(d)" of section 411, title 26, U.S.C. § 26 U.S.C.A. § 411(d), section 302(d) of the Revenue Act of 1926, requires that there shall be included in the value of the gross estate

The Jacobs Manufacturing Co.

10 Cited authorities

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 949, relied upon by plaintiff, arbitrability of the question of contracting out work was recognized as an interpretation of a management function clause of the agreement there involved.