The Hunkin-Conkey Construction Co.
2 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.
318 U.S. 9 (1943) Cited 108 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
National Labor v. Scientific Nutrition
180 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1950) Cited 7 timesNo. 11,694. February 24, 1950. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Attorney, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Paul St. Sure and Edward H. Moore, Oakland, Cal., for respondent. Tobriner Lazarus, Mathew O. Tobriner and Stanley Neyhart, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenors. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and POPE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This case is in certain aspects a companion case to N.L.R.B. v. C.W. Hume