§
The Cross Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.

    303 U.S. 41 (1938)   Cited 1,426 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court

  2. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn

    319 U.S. 21 (1943)   Cited 607 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 2105 is inapplicable to criminal trials

  3. Ex Parte Fahey

    332 U.S. 258 (1947)   Cited 332 times
    Stating that the “extraordinary remed[y]” of mandamus “should be resorted to only where appeal is a clearly inadequate remedy”

  4. A.F. of L. v. Labor Board

    308 U.S. 401 (1940)   Cited 340 times
    Holding that certification is not a final order

  5. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 258 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  6. Massey-Harris-Ferguson Limited v. Boyd, Dist. Judge

    355 U.S. 806 (1957)   Cited 25 times
    Refusing to issue a writ of mandamus to correct the trial court's order overruling relator's special appearance and motion to quash, where the order was subject to review on appeal from a final judgment

  7. Massey-Harris-Ferguson, Limited v. Boyd

    242 F.2d 800 (6th Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 13121. April 12, 1957. Cahill, Gordon, Reindel Ohl, John F. Sonnett, Kenneth D. Wallace, New York City, Canada, Russell, Turner Alexander, Cooper Turner, Jr., Thomas R. Price, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Lowell W. Taylor, William A. Percy, Memphis, Tenn., for movants, Southland Tractors, Inc., and Farm Tractors, Inc. Before ALLEN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Circuit Judge. Petitioner, Massey-Harris-Ferguson, Limited, a Canadian corporation with its principal