§

The American Bottling Company, Inc. d/b/a Dr. Pepper/Snapple Group

357 N.L.R.B. 1804 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
The American Bottling Company, Inc. d/b/a Dr. Pepper/Snapple Group

20 Cited authorities

  1. Galmish v. Cicchini

    90 Ohio St. 3d 22 (Ohio 2000)   Cited 360 times
    Holding that the parol-evidence rule applies `"absent fraud, mistake or other invalidating cause'"

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. Beatley v. Knisley

    2009 Ohio 2229 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 23 times

    No. 08AP-696. Decided May 12, 2009. Kevin E. Humphreys; and William J. Rees, for appellees. James C. Becker, for appellants. KLATT, Judge. {¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Katherine Knisley, Jaclyn Wanner, and Julianne L. Irene, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Jack K. Beatley. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand. {¶ 2} Defendants all attend college in Columbus. In January 2006, defendants began looking for rental housing in the

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Majestic Weaving Co.

    355 F.2d 854 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 84 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Board, "after appropriate proceedings, [to] . . . fashion for prospective application a principle along the general lines of that adopted here"

  5. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  6. Hotel Employees, Local 2 v. Marriott Corp.

    961 F.2d 1464 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that an employer could waive its right to demand a National Labor Relations Board election

  7. Local 65-B v. Nat'l. Labor Relations Bd.

    572 F.3d 342 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 10 times

    No. 08-4045. Argued May 28, 2009. Decided July 10, 2009. Thomas D. Allison, Attorney (argued), Allison, Slutsky Kennedy, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Joseph A. Barker, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, IL, Linda J. Dreeben, Daniel A. Blitz, Attorney (argued), National Labor Relations Board Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Steven L. Hamann, Vedder Price Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, IL, for Intervener. Before BAUER, FLAUM, and KANNE, Circuit Judges. FLAUM, Circuit

  8. California Gas Tran. v. N.L.R.B

    507 F.3d 847 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 9 times
    Acknowledging that terminating employment based on union activity is an unfair labor practice subject to the NLRA

  9. Torbitt Castleman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    123 F.3d 899 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 16 times
    Stating that an employee's subjective reaction does not render the challenged conduct unlawful

  10. Martinsville Nylon Employees Council Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    969 F.2d 1263 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 21 times
    Notwithstanding inclusion of integration clause in renegotiated agreement, "past practice may still inform the Board's understanding of what the written agreement means"